Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Roberto Carballes Baena Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Baena analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Roberto Carballes Baena Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 0 - 0 Baena
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.56% of points on his second serve, while Baena has won 51.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 53.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Baena has won 51.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.96% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 63.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Baena has saved 59.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 57.75% of matches played (W/L 41/ 30), with Baena winning 45.61% (W/L 26/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Baena has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 491/ 298), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 6/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18), where as Baena has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.83% of matches (W/L 13/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.69 while Baena has played against players with an average rank of 183.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Baena has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 45.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Baena has converted 36.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
95
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
63
Rank
49
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
60% (317-207)
Career Total W/L
59% (553-385)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$2,498,385
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Roberto Carballes Baena |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (44/31) | 49% (35/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (380/332) | 49% (320/338) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 52% (11/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:48 | 1:51:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 211.48 | 177.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1610/2290) | 67% (1340/2003) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1071/1610) | 66% (881/1340) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (375/680) | 51% (339/663) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (96/207) | 37% (68/186) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (891/2262) | 39% (787/2036) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 56% (10/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 48% (13/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 7% (14/1) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Karen Khachanov
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Carballes Baena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Altmaier
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
78)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Christopher O'Connell
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(7) 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Dominik Koepfer
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nagal Vs Baena Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Roberto Carballes Baena
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
